Quick Verdict: CrewAI vs LlamaIndex
Choose CrewAI if: You need multi-agent teams with role-based task delegation.
Choose LlamaIndex if: You’re building RAG systems with complex data ingestion and indexing needs.
Choose Draft’n Run if: You want both capabilities in a visual builder with production deployment.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | CrewAI | LlamaIndex | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Multi-agent orchestration | RAG & data pipelines | Different strengths |
| Data Handling | Basic | Advanced (40+ loaders) | 🏆 LlamaIndex |
| Agent Support | Native multi-agent | Single agent focus | 🏆 CrewAI |
| Learning Curve | Easy | Moderate | 🏆 CrewAI |
| Production Tools | Basic | LlamaCloud available | 🏆 LlamaIndex |
| Pricing | $40/mo cloud | $200/mo cloud | 🏆 CrewAI |
Use Case Comparison
Best for CrewAI:
- Customer service teams
- Content generation pipelines
- Sales automation
- Task delegation systems
- Role-based workflows
Best for LlamaIndex:
- Document Q&A systems
- Knowledge base search
- Data analysis pipelines
- PDF/document processing
- Semantic search applications
Code Examples: Building a Research Assistant
CrewAI Approach:
from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew
researcher = Agent(
role='Research Analyst',
goal='Find and analyze information',
tools=[search_tool, web_scraper]
)
analyst = Agent(
role='Data Analyst',
goal='Extract insights from data',
tools=[data_tool]
)
research_task = Task(
description='Research {topic} thoroughly',
agent=researcher,
expected_output='Comprehensive research report'
)
crew = Crew(
agents=[researcher, analyst],
tasks=[research_task],
verbose=True
)
result = crew.kickoff({"topic": "AI frameworks"})
LlamaIndex Approach:
from llama_index import VectorStoreIndex, SimpleDirectoryReader
from llama_index.llms import OpenAI
# Load and index documents
documents = SimpleDirectoryReader('data/').load_data()
index = VectorStoreIndex.from_documents(documents)
# Create query engine
query_engine = index.as_query_engine(
llm=OpenAI(model="gpt-4"),
similarity_top_k=5
)
# Query the knowledge base
response = query_engine.query("Tell me about AI frameworks")
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CrewAI | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 5 minutes | 10 minutes |
| Document Processing | Limited | Excellent |
| Query Speed | 1.5s average | 0.8s with cache |
| Memory Usage | 150MB base | 200MB+ with index |
| Token Efficiency | Good | Excellent with retrieval |
Integration Capabilities
CrewAI Integrations:
- OpenAI, Anthropic, Google AI
- Basic web tools
- Custom Python functions
- ~20 built-in tools
LlamaIndex Integrations:
- 40+ data loaders
- Multiple vector stores
- All major LLMs
- Observability tools
- Knowledge graphs
Pricing Breakdown
CrewAI:
- Open Source: Free
- CrewAI Cloud: $40/month
- Enterprise: Custom
LlamaIndex:
- Open Source: Free
- LlamaCloud: $200/month
- LlamaParse: $0.003/page
- Enterprise: Custom
Draft’n Run Alternative:
- Free Tier: 1,000 runs/month
- Pro: $49/month
- Enterprise: Custom
- Includes: Both agent orchestration AND RAG capabilities
When to Use Each
Use CrewAI When:
- Building customer service automation
- Need role-based task distribution
- Creating content generation teams
- Simpler setup is priority
Use LlamaIndex When:
- Building document Q&A systems
- Processing large document sets
- Need advanced RAG capabilities
- Complex data pipelines required
Use Draft'n Run When:
- Need both agent orchestration AND RAG
- Want visual workflow design
- Require production monitoring
- Prefer no-code/low-code approach
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use both frameworks together?
Yes! Use LlamaIndex for data ingestion and RAG, then CrewAI for multi-agent orchestration. Draft’n Run makes this combination seamless.
Which is better for document processing?
LlamaIndex is superior for document processing with 40+ data loaders and advanced indexing. CrewAI would need custom tools for complex document handling.
Which framework scales better?
LlamaIndex scales better for data-heavy applications. CrewAI scales better for multi-agent coordination. Draft’n Run handles both scaling patterns.
Final Recommendation
For multi-agent systems: CrewAI wins with simpler setup and native agent coordination.
For RAG and data pipelines: LlamaIndex is unmatched in document processing and retrieval.
For comprehensive AI workflows: Use Draft’n Run to get both capabilities in a visual, production-ready platform.
---Related Comparisons & Resources
More Platform Comparisons:
- Draft’n Run vs n8n - AI-first vs general automation
- Make vs Zapier vs Draft’n Run - Full platform comparison
- LangChain vs LlamaIndex - RAG framework comparison
- CrewAI vs LangChain - Multi-agent frameworks
Alternative Platform Guides:
- LangChain Alternatives - LangChain alternatives
- Zapier Alternatives - Zapier alternatives for AI
- Make Alternatives - Make alternatives
- n8n Alternatives - n8n alternatives guide
Draft’n Run Platform:
- AI Workflow Builder - Visual workflow builder
- AI Chatbot Platform - Build production chatbots
- AI Automation - End-to-end automation
- Integration Library - 100+ integrations
- Pricing - See plans
- Request Demo - Get started
Build AI Workflows in Minutes, Not Months!
Deploy production-ready AI workflows with complete transparency and control.
Start building today! Start free trial →